BT Infinity is launched and the Rural Broadband Divide widens once again.

Old Bike or Rural Broadband Speed ?

Old Bike and Rural Broadband Speed

The country is waking up to the news that BT is finally rolling out their 50MB fibre-optic broadband product called BT Infinity and Virgin announce their 100MB service. The consumers and businesses located in major towns and cities should be jumping with joy at the prospect of super-fast broadband at their home or business whilst those that live in a rural area sigh once again at the prospect of the digital divide widening even further. Rural areas will be stuck on 2MB max download and the rest of the country  on 8MB and soon rising to 100MB.

I’m speaking from experience as I live (and built several businesses)  within a rural area of Warwickshire, 10 miles from Leicester but within the BT exchange reach of a delightful but very small market town.

The broadband here is woeful and indicative of other rural areas; the best connectivity available at 2MB download but most broadband delivers between 400 and 800kb download (my own ADSL runs at 600kb).

I personally know of a number of businesses that moved from my rural area to Leicester simply because of the connectivity problems associated with a rural area – two of these businesses were my own and there are countless more across the country.

Unfortunately this is an issue that won’t be solved without radical thinking as it’s a question of economics not technology.

For the likes of BT or Virgin to roll-out fibre to small rural areas is prohibitively expensive and actually not viable in some areas as rural properties mostly have the BT lines going straight back to an exchange and not through a street side cabinet. Many of the actual copper wires are too long to support high speed broadband.

The fact is that high speed broadband is becoming more and more vital for consumers and businesses and this doesn’t change whether you live and work in a rural area or city – it’s still critically important.

Therefore the issue must be solved if we are to finally close the digital divide, stop people and businesses migrating needlessly to cities, and finally create equal and fair access to high speed broadband for all.

There are options; the first was mentioned in one of my previousarticles that centred on a Broadband Grant System giving subsidies to businesses who order more expensive private circuits. Unfortunately there seems to be little appetite for the government to shell out money for this system given the current austerity measures being rolled-out.

However, there is a second way to deliver fast broadband to rural areas without requiring government subsidies. This plan involves two parts;

Firstly, BT launched a new product available under their LLU (local loop unbundling) program. This new product simply consists of a discounted bundle of 4 or 8 copper LLU lines – something that can be accomplished by them quite easily. Once these bundled lines are available for a lower cost, an LLU provider (or indeed BT themselves) could combine the bandwidth’s across these lines to present the end user a single broadband connection with 4 or 8 times the bandwidth of a single ADSL which would equate to approx. 10meg connection or on a very long distance a minimum of 4meg download which is significantly better than the 500kbs achieve today on long distance rural connections.

Secondly, BT making available a discounted backhaul link for LLU providers. This fibre link would allow the LLU provider to connect the local rural exchange back to their network (usually in London) for a discounted rate.

Together these two elements would enable every ISP to deliver rural high speed broadband services whilst making money in the process which would encourage ISPs to deliver without having to incur the costly expense of digging up roads and laying fibre.


3 thoughts on “BT Infinity is launched and the Rural Broadband Divide widens once again.

  1. chrisconder says:
    chrisconder's avatar

    I don’t agree with your first point. Once the rurals are on bonded copper (BET) see http://media140.com/?p=252 then they will never get access to fast broadband. It costs a lot of money to implement bonding, and all it does is protect the copper cabal for another decade. Copper can never deliver decent connectivity over distance. Far better to go with your second point, get the fibre out to the rural community and let them do something with it. The initiative in cumbria where the plan is to build digital village pumps is the best so far.
    Once a community has access to affordable gigabit backhaul it is worth them laying their own fibre to join it. it becomes cost effective to pay for the connection if it means they have next generation access to a fat pipe instead of a leaky bucket.
    The final third has to help itself. www finalthirdfirst org

    • Mark Seemann says:
      Mark Seemann's avatar

      Chris, In response to you, I agree with you that fibre to the home is the only way to get super fast broadband. However rural areas are many years away from this reality and bonded copper is the only practical approach for now. It can never be as good as fibre but it will be better than what we have today. Also giving lower cost back-haul to the service providers will not be a sufficient incentive on its own because the far greater cost is providing the fibre local loop to the home.
      At the end of the day, it will cost BT far less to lay more copper and remove the DACs than it would to roll fibre in to these rural areas. As much as I want fibre to my rural home, I know it isn’t going to happen as the economics are simply not there and the government seems to take the view that broadband is better than no broadband – even if it isn’t super fast.
      Given the current austerity measures and the lack-lustre economy I still believe that bonded DSL is the only practical approach we have available to us today.

  2. chrisconder says:
    chrisconder's avatar

    Sorry, but if bonding goes ahead it effectively means the copper cabal will continue to hold this country to ransom for many years. The connection it delivers is not fit for purpose now, let alone in another decade. It is expensive way of protecting the rest of the network. Far better to get fibre to the rurals, then the telcos will soon do the urban areas. The way to move forward is to remove the valuation office tax on new lit fibre so other private companies can do the job that openreach doesn’t want to do. Once there is a level playing field and the incumbent isn’t protected then an open market place will soon sort the men from the boys. If new copper is laid it is a crime. The future won’t wait for us to catch up.
    Other countries forge ahead, and we are going to be in the copper slow lane. Its not on.
    We must say NO to BET.
    chris

Leave a comment